Competição Geopolítica e Aquisição Tecnológica nas Forças Armadas dos Estados Unidos (2010-2014)

Hélio Caetano Farias, Fernando Botafogo Oliveira

Abstract


Este artigo analisa o processo de aquisição tecnológica no Planejamento de Força das Forças Armadas dos Estados Unidos entre 2010-2014. Para tanto, foram consultados documentos oficiais publicados pela Casa Branca e pelo Departamento de Defesa no período de 2010 a 2018, além de uma revisão bibliográfica. Partindo da hipótese de que a aquisição tecnológica foi um ponto central para o desenvolvimento de capacidades de defesa, como pode ser demonstrado pela análise das Estratégias de Compensação e dos Relatórios Quadrienais de Defesa, constatou-se que a reorientação das prioridades estratégicas das Forças Armadas norte-americanas indicou uma série de vulnerabilidades tecnológicas para a manutenção da condição de potência global, especialmente com a contestação de sua supremacia militar na região da Ásia-Pacífico.

Keywords


Geopolítica, Aquisição Tecnológica, Defesa, EUA

References


CHRISTIANSSON, Magnus. Defense planning beyond rationalism: the third offset strategy as a case of metagovernance. Defence Studies, v. 18, p. 1–17, 2017.

CLAUSEWITZ, Carl von. On War. Edited: Peter Paret, Michael Howard. Yale: Yale University Press, 1986.

COLBY, Elbridge A.; MITCHELL, A. Wess. The Age of Great-Power Competition: How the Trump Administration Refashioned American Strategy. Foreign Affairs., v. 99, p. 118, 2020.

DEFENSE Acquisition Guidebook 2013. 2013. Available: https://at.dod.mil/sites/default/files/documents/DefenseAcquisitionGuidebook.pdf. Accessed on: maio 2020.

DEFENSE Strategic Guidance: Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense. Jan. 2012

DUARTE, Érico. A Independência Norte-Americana: Guerra, Revolução e Logística. Porto Alegre: Editora Leitura XXI, 2013.

ELLMAN, Jesse; Bell, Jacob. Analysis of Defense Products Contract Trends, 1990-2014. United States of America: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2014.

ELLMAN, Jesse et al. Defense acquisition trends, 2015: acquisition in the era of budgetary constraints: a report of Defense Outlook. United States of America: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2016.

ERBEL, Mark; KINSEY, Christopher. Think again – supplying war: reappraising military logistics and its centrality to strategy and war. Journal of Strategic Studies, v. 41, No. 4, p. 519–544, 2018.

FIORI, José Luís da Costa. Geopolítica internacional: a nova estratégia imperial dos Estados Unidos. Saúde em Debate, Rio de Janeiro, v. 42, n. spe.3, p. 10-17, nov. 2018.

GOES, Guilherme Sandoval. Geopolítica Mundial e America's Grand National Strategy: diálogos epistemológicos indissociáveis. Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval, Rio de Janeiro, v. 24, n. 3, 2018.

GRAY, Colin. Strategic Thoughts for Defence Planners. Survival, v. 52, n. 3, p. 159–178, 2010.

GRIECO, Kelly A. The 2018 National Defense Strategy: Continuity and Competition. Strategic Studies Quarterly, v. 12, n. 2 (2018): 3-8. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26430813?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents. Accessed on: jun. 2020.

GUNZINGER, Mark. Shaping America’s future military: toward a new force planning construct. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2013.

HOFFMAN, Frank G. Shaping the 21st Century Military. Orbis, v. 61, No. 1, p. 43–63, 2017.

LARSON, Eric. Force Planning Scenarios, 1946 - 2016: Their Origins and Use in Defense Strategic Planning. United States of America: RAND Corporation, 2019.

LIOTTA, P. H.; LLOYD, Richmond M. From here to there: the strategy and force planning framework. Naval War College Review, v. 58, No. 2, p. 121-138, 2005.

MARKOWSKI, Stefan; HALL, Peter. Challenges of Defence Procurement. Defence and Peace Economics, v. 9, No.1-2, p. 3-37, 1998.

MARTINAGE, Robert. Toward a new Offset Strategy: Exploiting US long-term advantages to restore US global power projection capability. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2014.

MEARSHEIMER, John; WALT, Stephen. The case for Offshore Balancing: a superior U.S Grand Strategy. Foreign Affairs. jul./aug. 2016.

MEDEIROS, Carlos. O Desenvolvimento Tecnológico Americano no Pós-Guerra como um Empreendimento Militar. In: FIORI, José Luís. O Poder Americano. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2004.

MOORE, Adam. US military logistics outsourcing and the everywhere of war. Territory, Politics, Governance, v. 5, No. 1, p. 5–27, 2017.

NEUFELD, Jacob; WATSON Jr, George; CHENOWETH, David. Technology and the Air Force: A retrospective Assessment. Washington, D.C.: United States Air Force, 1997.

NEWELL, Clayton. The Framework of Operational Warfare. England: Routledge, 2003.

OCHMANEK, David et. al. America’s Security Deficit: Addressing the Imbalance Between Strategy and Resources in a Turbulent World. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2015.

OCHMANEK, David et al. US Military Capabilities and Forces for a Dangerous World: Rethinking the US Approach to Force Planning. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2017.

ORR, Kelly. King of the Killing Zone: The story of M-1, America's super tank. United States of America: Book News, 1989.

OWENS, Mackubin Thomas. Force Planning: The Crossroads of Strategy and the Political Process. Orbis, v. 59, No. 3, p. 411–437, 2015.

PROENÇA, Domício; DUARTE, Érico. The concept of logistics derived from Clausewitz: All that is required so that the fighting force can be taken as a given. Journal of Strategic Studies, v. 28, No. 4, p. 645–677, 2005.

QUADRENNIAL Defense Review 2010. 2014. Available: https://archive.defense.gov/qdr/QDR%20as%20of%2029JAN10%201600.pdf. Accessed on: maio 2020.

QUADRENNIAL Defense Review 2014. 2014. Available: http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/2014_Quadrennial_Defense_Review.pdf. Accessed on: maio 2020.

RANDALL, Wesley et al. Performance-Based Logistics and Interfirm Team Processes: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Logistics, v. 36, No. 2, p. 212–230, 2015.

RICHARDSON, Doug. Stealth Warplanes: Deception, Evasion, and Concealment in the Air. United States of America: Zenith Press, 2001.

RUTTAN, Vernon. Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

SIPRI. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. 2020. Available: https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex#:~:text=The%20SIPRI%20Military%20Expenditure%20Database,for%20the%20period%201949%E2%80%932019.&text=The%20availability%20of%20data%20varies,at%20least%20the%20late%201950s. Accessed on: 08 jun. 2020.

SORENSON, David S. The Process and Politics of Defense Acquisition: A Reference Handbook. Westport: Praeger Security International, 2008.

THE 21ST CENTURY Security Environment and the Future of War. Parameters, v. 38, No. 4, p. 14-26, 2009.

TOMES, Robert. US Defense Strategy from Vietnam to Operation Iraqi Freedom: Military Innovation and the New American Way of War 1973-2003. England: Routledge, 2007.

TOMES, Robert. Why The Cold War Offset Strategy Was All About Deterrence and Stealth. War On The Rocks, 14 jan. 2015. Available: https://warontherocks.com/2015/01/why-the-cold-war-offset-strategy-was-all-about-deterrence-and-stealth/. Accessed on: maio 2020.

UNITED STATES. Quadrennial Defense Review 2010. 2010. Available: https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/QDR/QDR_as_of_29JAN10_1600.pdf. Accessed on: maio 2020.

UNITED STATES. National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. 2017. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf. Accessed on: abr. 2020.

VISACRO, Alessandro. Não basta vencer em múltiplos domínios: conjecturas sobre a nova doutrina do Exército dos Estados Unidos e os conflitos na zona cinza. Coleção Meira Mattos, Rio de Janeiro, v. 14, n. 50, p. 187-209, maio/ago. 2020.

WEAPONS: F-117 Nighthawk. PBS, 2010. Available: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/weapons/stealth.html. Accessed on: 17 maio 2020.

WEBB, Natalie; Richter, Anke; Bonsper, Donald. Linking Defense Planning and Resource Decisions: A Return to Systems Thinking. Defense & Security Analysis, v. 26, No. 4, p. 387–400, 2010


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE GUERRA NAVAL

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Indexes and directories:
resultado de imagem para Diadorim AZUL resultado de imagem para LOGO DE DOI CrossRef resultado de imagem para CAPES PERIÓDICAS Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional
 
 

REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE GUERRA NAVALJOURNAL OF THE NAVAL WAR COLLEGE

e-ISSN: 2359-3075
ISSN: 1809-3191

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS ON-LINE SUBMISSION